|
|
|
Supreme Being
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 6:26 PM
Posts: 570,
Visits: 791
|
|
| Although I've never tested a 3-2 set up we have found some definite trends with Y-Block engines. We found that with 9.5:1 compression and a streetable cam a Y-Block with ported factory heads could make 1.07-1.10 ft. lbs per cubic inch. This covered a number of builds from 314 cu in to 337 cu in and 224 @ .050" cams up to 240 @ .050" cams. Intakes ranged from modified 1957 ECZ-B intakes to Blue Thunder to Edelbrock 257 2-4 intake. The 314 made 1.13 ft lbs per cu in but had 10.0:1 CR. Ted's stock head dyno mule comes in just a shade under that and experience indicates that ported heads will only add 10-15 ft lbs to that engine. From the testing I have seen stock ECZ-G heads are limited to 285HP +-5. A good port job can take this up to 325-360 depending on cam, compression and displacement. Porting Y-Block heads can make a substantial difference in HP but will have little effect on torque. All testing was done with either ECZ-G or -113 heads. To make over 365hp with ported factory heads the testing I've done indicates that the CR must at least 10.5:1 and the cam needs to approach 250 degrees @ .050". Displacement will need to be 330+ cu in.
http://ford-y-block.com 20 miles east of San Diego, 20 miles north of Mexico 
|
|
|
|
|
Co-Administrator
Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 4:32 AM
Posts: 3,241,
Visits: 2,198
|
|
Pete's Panel (6/3/2010)
Hi Ted, do you think the performance of the Cain manifold will improve with the alloy heads???Pete. I doubt that I’d see any improvement in the numbers originally posted by the Cain manifold if used on the aluminum heads. Torque band was flat and low on the ported heads that the Cain manifold was tried on and that was simply due to the runnerless design of the manifold. But I do have plans to run that manifold again in the future on another set of ported iron heads while experimenting with some plenum dividers and different carb spacers. All this is being done just to see if the manifold can even come close to matching the performance of some other intakes I have here. Any information learned from this can go into the development of a true single plane intake for the Y.
  Lorena, Texas (South of Waco)
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Member
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, March 29, 2012 6:40 PM
Posts: 41,
Visits: 472
|
|
| John, The combustion chamber is small compared to the supercharger heads, what changes to head or pistons would be required to use these with a VR57 blower and what do you think performance would be?
|
|
|
|
|
Supreme Being
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 6:26 PM
Posts: 570,
Visits: 791
|
|
A lot depends on the size of the engine. A .060" over 292 will have 9.75:1 compression if zero decked. If a lower CR is desired a dished piston will easily lower compression. The VS57 doesn't work that well with very low compression so best to keep it in the 9.25-9.75 range.
http://ford-y-block.com 20 miles east of San Diego, 20 miles north of Mexico
|
|
|
|
|
Supreme Being
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 11:35 PM
Posts: 1,574,
Visits: 4,436
|
|
John: Possibly this has been covered before but I've not seen it. If your new heads are installed on a 292 or 312 with stock pistons (lets assume the block is not over bored more than 0.020 thousands) in a non decked block, what will the approximate compression ratios be? Thanks.
Paul
|
|
|
|